Caselaw

Criminal Case (Rishon LeZion) 24090-05-25 State of Israel v. Tom Ziv Ursula - part 26

December 24, 2025
Print

I did not find it appropriate to impose  a monetary case – the defendant was also fined money, in light of his detention in electronic handcuffs during which he did not work, and later he was arrested between bars and bars, as well as in light of the prison sentence that will be imposed on him in the sentence in question.

In addition, I also took into account in this matter the fact that due to the violations of the conditions imposed  on the defendant's Mali-supreme case, the court in the arrest proceeding partially forfeited  the consolidation of  the guarantees claims that were deposited  in the Kafi-supreme case by the defendant and the supervisors, so that the antitrust  fee of NIS 20,000 was forfeited.

In light of all of the above, I have found it appropriate to place  the defendant's sentence in the middle third of the punishment compounds that have been determined, and to impose on him a total prison sentence, along with significant and deterrent financial case imprisonments, to impose on him to pay compensation to the victims of the offenses, and to disqualify  the consolidation of the defendant's driver's license claims in the case ofa financial-supreme  case and a financial-supreme condition.

Conclusion

Affirming a financial case - Supreme Court Yes, I am declaring  a financial case - Supreme Court in which the defendant consolidates the punitive claims, as follows:

  1. Imprisonment in Po18-month financial file - Supreme Court, from which the days of his arrest will be deducted from the Supreme Financial Case according to IPS records.
  2. Imprisonment in a financial case – the highest conditional for 6 months, and the defendant will not bear this sentence unless he commits any offense against property of the felony type within three years of his release from prison.
  • Imprisonment in a financial case – supreme condition for 4 months, and the defendant will not bear this sentence unless he commits within three years of his release from prison any offense against property of the misdemeanor type (except for the offense of possession of property suspected of being stolen) or the offense of threats.
  1. Imprisonment in a financial case – the highest condition for one month, and the defendant will not bear this sentence unless he passes within three years from the date of his release from prison offenses of violating a legal provision or driving without a driver's license or driving without insurance.
  2. Compensation in the amount of NIS 2,000 to be paid to the complainant, Paz Niwald, prosecution witness 3 in the attached file, no later than 01.03.2026.  The accuser shall submit to the court secretariat within 14 days  the consolidation of the complainant's private claims for the purpose of executingthe payment appeals committee.
  3. I disqualify the defendant from the National Insurance Institute and hold a driver's license for a year, a disqualification in practice. The disqualification will begin from the date the defendant is released from prison and will be summarized for any other disqualification that he has not yet completed his sentence.  I have recorded before  me the consolidation of claims of the defendant's declaration that he does not hold a driver's license.
  • I disqualify the defendant from receivingthe National Insurance Institute and holding a driver's license for one year, disqualification of a financial case - supreme condition, and the defendant will not bear this punishment unless he passes within 3 years from the date of his release from prison the offense of driving without a driver's license or driving without insurance or driving while disqualified.

An injunction/injunction (permanent) was issued/injunction/injunction (permanent) and a general injunction (permanent) for exhibits. 

Previous part1...2526
27Next part