The defendant should be credited with the consolidation of the claims, his confession to the offenses attributed to him, the remorse and the appeal of a financial-supreme case, the decision of the registrar that he expressed, which I was under the impression that his words were said honestly, and the resulting saving of judicial time and the need to hear the testimonies.
I also took into account her voice in the case of a declaratory and general collective dispute in which the defendant was in electronic handcuffs.
The defendant must be credited with consolidating his criminal record, which includes 3 previous convictions, as follows:
The first was from 2019, in which a job was hired under the authority of a registrar for the offense of possession/use of drugs for self-consumption and for the offense of possession of burglary tools, for which a financial case was imposed on the defendant and a financial case with a supreme sentence of imprisonment, a financial case with a supreme probation, along with accompanying punitive components.
The second was from 2019, in which a registrar was hired for offenses of transporting weapons, debit card fraud and possession/use of drugs for self-consumption, for which a financial case was imposed on the defendant with a 32-month prison sentence in a financial and upper financial file, along with accompanying punitive components.
The third was from 2020, in which a job was hired with the authority of a registrar foroffenses of obstructing a police officer and possession/use of drugs for self-consumption, for which a financial case was imposed on the defendant and imprisonment in the financial case - supreme probation, along with accompanying punitive components.
In addition, the defendant had a traffic record of 29 convictions, of which 6 times he orderedwages under the authority of the Registrar of offenses related to driving without a driver's license, and it is evident that the sanctions imposed on him, which were increased from time to time, did not cause him to stop driving without a license, as detailed: In 2016, a wage order under the authority of the Registrar of the defendant for an offense related to driving when the validity of the vehicle's license expired less than four months, In 2017, a wage order under the authority of the Registrar of the defendant in an offense involving the driver's license expired from a financial case – the Supreme Court imposed a fine of 6 months and up to 2 years ; in 2018, a wage order under the authority of the Registrar of the defendant in an offense involving the driver's license expired from a financial case – Supreme Court for which a fine was imposed; in 2018 a wage order under the authority of the Registrar of the defendant in an offense involving the driver's license expired from a financial case – Supreme Court for which the defendant was fined; in 2018 a wage orderunder the authority of the Registrar The defendant in an offense involving the driver's license expired from a financial case - supreme of two years, for which a financial case was imposed - supreme The defendant was fined, along with the suspension of a license in afinancial case - supreme to be suspendedCollective dispute of declaratory law - general of 4 months, as well as the disqualification of a financial case - supreme condition; In 2018, a wage order under the authority of the registrar of the defendant in an offense involving the driver's license expired from a financial case - supreme for two years, for which a financial case was imposed - supreme The defendant was fined, along with the suspension of the financial file - supreme probation; in 2020, he orderedwages under the authority of the registrar of the defendant for an offense related to non-holding of a driver's license, for which a financial case was imposed - supreme for which the defendant imposed a prison sentence in a financial case - supreme condition, a fine, suspension of a driver's license in pu financial file - supreme probation, and disqualification of a financial file - supreme probation.