As noted above, as part of the attached file, the possibility of transferring the defendant's case to the community court was examined. The defendant expressed high motivation to receive treatment and the probation service supported this, in light of the various difficulties that the defendant faces and the therapeutic response he needs in various aspects of his life. The accuser also supported the injunction / injunction (permanent) do/injunction (permanent) injunction / injunction (permanent) prevention (permanent) demolition without this conviction of the probation service, the attached file was transferred to the community court, unfortunately, this option was taken off the agenda, since even before the first hearing in the community court the defendant was arrested for the offenses he committed in the main case.
From the suitability report submitted by the Probation Service in the attached file, it emerged that the defendant stated that he was in a financial case, a long-term addiction to mind-altering substances, including active use of street drugs, which leads him to dangerous situations, affects the proper functioning of a financial case, and also meets the basisof dispute resolution by the Offenses Appeals Committee in this case.
According to the Probation Service's assessment, drug addiction, which is based on emotional problems and traumatic events in the defendant's past, puts him at risk of recurrence of the Criminal Appeals Committee in a financial case – the Supreme Court.
Due to his mental state, the defendant was assigned a financial case by the National Insurance Institute, temporary medical disability of 64% and 100% loss of work capacity.
The circumstances of the defendant's life are difficult, and naturally, there was a request to dissolve the marriage and his mental state as a result in order to influence a financial case – his conduct is supreme and a financial case – supreme in the Offenses Appeals Committee, and this should be taken into account in determining his sentence.