Moreover. If indeed the requirement is that only a clear law of the Knesset can restrict a basic right of the type in question, it means that such a law, due to its clarity, restricts the interpreter. Interpretive options are more limited. After all, things are interconnected. Therefore, whatever the interpretation may be, for the term interpretation in the spirit of the Basic Laws, this interpretation will be more limited the clearer the law.
(b) The language of the law indicating its purpose:
The Enabling Law is explicitly intended to prohibit the sale of pigs. In this way, this law differs from other laws, in which the authority given to the administrative authority or the minister in charge is general, and the authorized person steers the matter to a religious channel. An example of this is the Horev High Court of Justice [17], in which the Minister of Transportation is authorized to make traffic arrangements, and the arrangements set by him related to the closure of roads on the Sabbath. Another example is the Mitral case [10] cited above. The facts prior to the amendment of the law were a law that granted the Minister of Industry the authority to regulate the import of goods, and the petition was directed against the prohibition on the import of any non-kosher meat, to all areas of the country, on the basis of the said authority.
Without determining in what situation a minister is entitled to take into account religious considerations even if he has not been explicitly authorized in the matter, it seems clear to me that the action of the authority is more legitimate, and less subject to judicial, interpretive or other scrutiny, in a situation in which the chief legislature has granted it authority in matters of religion from the outset and explicitly. This is the case before us.
(c) The Law Provides Consideration-Broad opinion of the competent authority:
The language of the Accreditation Law itself refers to this approach. The law states that the sale of pork can be restricted in a certain area of the city or in all of its boundaries. The law did not set a test in this regard. We must not assume that only in a certain type of city can a sweeping prohibition be enacted. The only restriction that appears in the law is that whatever the prohibition, it must apply "to the entire population in that area or in that part thereof" (section 2 of the law).