[....]
The Witness, Dr. Julie G.: Again, you can look at the names on the invoices we issued. A lot of that happened 5 years ago already, and I don't remember specific details but yes I can say there was Edward, he has a PhD in toxicology. Magen Roberts, as above, Ph.D. in toxicology. Rebecca Teitner, she has a master's degree in public health or science, science, I don't remember. Leon Aspera, he has a doctorate in epidemiology. I remember these people as helping with scientific research. As for the librarians, there was Sarah Albright and Dan Olivera. I don't remember who the editor was, I can find out, but these are most, if not all, people who worked on the project.
Adv. A. Amorai: Didn't I think of writing the names? Didn't you think it was important? Say This is my staff.
The Witness, Dr. Julie G.: ... The names of the people who worked with me appear on the invoices, it is clear from there who worked on the project and who did not. But this report is my opinion, I'm here as an expert and I'm telling you it's my opinion. And it's that they helped me, neither up nor down.
:Q Would it be correct to say that the opinion that you submitted to the honorable judge, that you submitted to Attorney Goren, sorry, for $160,000, is a collection of data that you took from another opinion, did you not examine it and submitted it to the court? Is that right, ma'am?
:A It's not true, I don't understand what you're asking, they asked me to do an evaluation, I myself determined what needed to be done, what was needed scientifically to answer the question I was asked. I worked with a team, I delegated work to the team members, this is how it is customary. Especially when it comes to so many surgeries that need to be performed.
(In detail, pp. 2191-2196).
- As for the documents and data that she had before her eyes before preparing the opinion, the expert noted, among other things:
Adv. A. Amorai: Can you tell us what other documents this respectable group gave you? In numbered form, did you get them? Translated into English.