Adv. Mr. Amos Goren: It's emissionsThis is emissions.
Adv. Mr. Gil Atar: Non-concentrations
The Honorable Judge D. Chasdai: The state of pollutant emissions into the air.
[....]
Interpreter, A. Second: I didn't focus on refugees. I focused on the levels that exist in the air around me. People are not exposed to emissions. They can be on the other side of the world But what matters is what's in the air in Haifa But regarding the reduction of pollutant levels, I look at a range between 2005 and 2018, which means that I see the highest and the lowest.
Adv. Mr. Amos Goren: It's in concentrations, not in emissions.
Adv. Mr. Gil Atar: In her opinion I think it's concentrations.
Adv. Mr. Amos Goren: The high and low is Concentrations.
Interpreter, A. Second: Regarding the reduction of pollutant levels, I look at a range of concentrations between 2005 and 2018, meaning that I see the highest, the highest concentration and the lowest concentration, and then if the reduction of emissions had a large impact on environmental air concentrations, it would be reflected in the numbers Goddess (Pages 2357-2356)
(See also: testimony of Dr. Goodman at pp. 2221-2223).
- In her interrogation, Dr. Goodman emphasized, among other things, that:
Interpreter, A. Second: once again The assessment I made was an assessment of the levels of pollutants in the air where people live, in the places where people live. I did not make an assessment regarding the sources of the particulate matter And there are many sources of particulate matter, including vehicles for example, but I don't dispute that a certain level of particulate matter is emitted, the factories emit a certain level of PM. But that doesn't contradict the fact that levels in places where people live are below levels that define health risks and are similar to levels in other cities...
(page 2322, lines 23-30) (see also: her testimony on page 2357, lines 19-23).
This is what the expert Dr. Goodman testified in addition: