A: of materials.
Q: Radicals.
A: Yes.
Q: Right?
A: Dust, all sorts of other things., not necessarily chemical pollutants.
Q: You said synergy as well.
A: Or, yes.
Q: There is some kind of analysis in your opinion that says how many radicals are caused when there is synergy?
A: No, there isn't.
Q: There is no such thing.
A: I don't, but I have data on synergy and facts.
Q: And facts, but not about radicals.
A: Anonymous.
Q: And there isn't.
A: As for standards, it catches.
Q: As for standards, it catches.
A: Standards. But to tell you about radicals, I don't have data.
Q: Okay. Ok. And if I understood you correctly before, you... There is no analysis in your opinion about how many radicals there were in each of the four plaintiffs. There's Klein here and three others.
A: No, I don't have..
Q: There is no such analysis.
A: I can't believe they checked it.
(pp. 180-181) (see also his testimony at pp. 182-183).
'Inaccuracies' in Dr. Shlita's Opinion
- With regard to page 22 of his opinion on the matter of 'kidney liver disease' (hemochromatosis liver), Shlita was asked and answered as follows:
Q: Liver disease, did you say that liver disease is caused by excess radicals?
A: Yes, I see here that - not significant. That doesn't mean it shouldn't.
Q: Wait, first of all, look, wait, little by little, let me ask you the questions.
A: Yes.
Q: Please. You wrote that liver disease is caused by an excess of radicals according to this table.
A: Yes.
Q: Now that we look at the table about the disease, liver disease, hemochromatosis, we see that he writes that – NO SIGNIFICANCE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN PATIENTS AND CONTROL SUBJECTS. And he writes that 8OH LEVELS NOT ELEVATED IN LIVER hemochromatosis PATIENTS AND SIGNIFICANTLY LOWERED IN LIVER OF WILLSON DISEASE. Do you see that?
A: All right.