A: I don't remember telling you.
[....]
Q: If I tell you that non small cell, non small cell are the vast majority of cancers because the small cell It's a very small part of lung cancer, so the non small cell This is the vast majority of lung cancer diseases. Do you confirm this? Could it be?
A: I don't deal with epidemiology.
Q: You don't deal with epidemiology.
A: No, if there was no precision, there would be no accuracy, but in those that there are – there are.
And later on -
Q: So please confirm to me that non-small cell lung cancer is not caused by radicals caused by exposure to chemicals.
A: non significantYes, I confirm.
Q: Confirm. Now tell me, we see here that both breast cancer and non-small cell lung cancer are not caused by radicals.
A: Yes.
Q: Your thesis is that an excess of radicals causes cancer.
A: True.
Q: So one case of a type of cancer that isn't caused by excess radicals is enough to contradict the thesis, right?
A: It doesn't have to be because there are different mechanisms. If heavy metals... If you look here at the beginning, before the table there is an article that shows, if heavy metals come in, they have, there are metals that have 14 mechanisms to cause cancer.
Q: Radicals, we ask about radicals.
A: Cause Radicals, Not Cause Radicals But cancer is caused by 14 different mechanisms.
Q: But I ask about radicals, your opinion is about radicals. Not about other mechanisms, right?
A: It's not about radicals, it's not just about radicals, it's a mistake.
[....]
Q: Your review includes radicals but not only.
A: Yes.
Q: Your review describes another mechanism that causes cancer that is not radical.
A: Yes, there should be, I don't remember if I wrote them.
(pp. 144-146).
- Shlita was also asked about his thesis regarding the "free radicals" that cause cancer, and he answered as follows:
Q: But I'm not asking you about other mechanisms, I'm asking you about Radicals. You say in your opinion a million times that radicals cause all types of cancer, cause cancer.