A: No, not for all..
Q: Not for all cancers.
A: Not for all.
Q: Now you're saying that radicals don't cause all types of cancer?
A: I'm not saying it doesn't cause all types of cancer. I say there may be inaccuracies here, nothing happened.
Q: What is this?
A: It doesn't contradict you.
Q: It's not, nothing happened.
A: Yes.
Q: But we see now that an excess of radicals does not cause all cancers because we see at least according to your source two cancers, one of which is very, very serious, all lung cancers that are not small cells, which are not caused by an excess of radicals. So my question to you is if there is such a mechanism that the radicals rise and oxidative stress becomes stressed, so it damages the DNA and then cancer is caused and since all cancers, all cancers are caused by DNA damage.
A: Nope.
Q: So once we see one cancer and we have two big ones that aren't caused by it, where does that leave your thesis?
A: I explain to you, not all diseases are caused only by radicals. Radicals are part of the mechanisms. I say this. There are also other mechanisms, and if in the data of this study they were not checked, then we don't know, then it didn't come out according to the radicals, but it turned out that cancer was caused, sometimes even without a clear increase in radicals.
Q: But you notice that you don't answer my question, I'm asking you about a certain mechanism by which your opinion is concentrated.
A: She doesn't.
Q: This mechanism, wait, this mechanism is called the rise of radicals. Your opinion says radicals rise and antioxidants fail to control them, and oxidative stress feather,
A: Yes.
Q: This oxidative stress causes genotoxic damage and the genetox damage is cancer, it's all cancers.
A: Yes, yes.
Q: That's your thesis. Do you say yes? Right? Is that your thesis?
The Honorable Judge D. Chasdai: Is that correct? That's the thesis?