Q: So that's why.
A: That's true, but it's not full.
[....]
Q: I'm telling you that when there's one cancer, it's enough that it's a cancer that's caused by magnetoxidation, once you have one disease that's caused by magnetoxidation that's not caused by an oxidative barrier then your thesis is hidden, right?
A: Not that the splash is hidden, it doesn't cause everything. Yes, there are diseases that are caused by another mechanism (pages 147-148).
- With regard to cardiovascular disease (page 21 of the opinion below) – the expert was also referred to page 1208 of the opinion of Dr. Kook. He confirmed that there are very few studies that have examined the levels of oxidative damage to the dia. A. In connection with heart disease, but according to him, it is "... I don't mean there isn't." He confirmed that the article explicitly stated that it is not at all clear why high levels of the HO8 radical are associated with the early development of heart disease. He was shown that it was not clear whether the oxidative damage measured in lymphocytes represented what was happening in the heart, and he replied:
A: It can happen. There are things like that.
Q: Wait, is it true that this is what they say?
A: Yes, it can happen.
[....]
Q: So after they say all this, You are still saying that this article is proof that cardiovascular diseases are caused by oxidative damage?
A: No, I say that diseases, diseases that appear here in the table are mostly explained by oxidative damage and part of the damage is not significant, so it has not been proven. In these, in this part it was not proven, in this part it was proven.
He was asked why he did not refer the court in his opinion to the fact that in the article "... They qualify it, to the point of eliminating the possibility that heart disease is caused by oxidative damage," his answer:
A: It is not absolute here that the damage is complete.
Q: It's not just absolute. You distort it. We read English, we understand it.