A: Very true.
Q: It will depend on the concentration of the metal and the type of radicals that are formedRight?
A: That's right.
Q: and in the concentration of the metal to which they were exposed. Right?
A: In the Kishon air cocktail, sorry, air, Haifa Bay air, there are all the heavy metals you want so they will have other mechanisms.
Q: They will have mechanisms.
A: So we won't refer to the predium.
Q: But also, but you say you have descended, And about other metals, too, you say it depends on concentration.
A: It depends on concentration and there is also synergy between them.
Q: There is synergy. Synergy also depends on concentration, Right?
A: It depends on the concentration, but synergy causes that even at the concentration approved by the standard, it is too high and it causes damage.
(pp. 168-169).
- Shlita confirmed in relation to the above article, among other things:
Q: Now, please confirm me That there is not a single word in this article about chemical substances or exposure to chemical substances.
A: In this article, is that what we're talking about?
Q: Yes.
A: I don't see exposure to chemicals. Talking about oxidative stress.
Q: Yes, oxidative stress.
A: Yes, ok.
Q: Not from exposure to chemical substances, no word about chemical substances. Right?
A: Haifa Air Saved Here.
Q: The air in Haifa was saved here.
A: We don't talk about the pollutants.
(p. 172).
- Shlita was referring to an article mentioned in his opinion on 'Occupational Medicine' by Karl, Katsanovich and Smirnov, [marked as Exhibit M/3], and noted that he saw it as "... the exceptional matter" and replied as follows:
Q: How does it relate to your opinion?
A: I saw the anomalies. I am referring to the anomalies in the findings found in the air of the Kishon Bay.
Q: Where in this article is it written about anomalies found in the air of Kishon Bay?