Q: You've been claiming this for years, right?
A: Yes, I just copy from studies done and reports. I'm not making up a single word there (page 65, lines 12-29).
- During his cross-examination, Dr. Shlita was even referred to page 16 of his opinion and was presented:
Q: I ask whether when you wrote that Professor Friedman made a cut and paste for his current opinion as well, are you referring to what he wrote in his opinion on the matter? The Kishon?
A: Yes, yes, yes, yes
Q: Ok. Now. You will agree with me.
A: He's also a radiation expert, he's also a radiation expert, by the way.
Q: You agree with me that dozens of pages of your opinion here, the main opinion, are also copied from the opinion in the Kishon Building?
A: Some parts I may have taken.
Q: Certain parts? If I say more than 15-20 pages, would that be correct?
A: No, I don't know how to tell you. It's her, how do you say? It's the same thing, it's all the same big hazard.
Q: The same big hazard.
A: Yes, part of the hazard.
Q: I'll just point out and if you want we'll also see, it's just a waste of the court's time,
A: Yes.
Q: I'll tell you as an example on page 18 of your main opinion.
A: We say in the main way.
Q: Yes.
A: 18. Yes.
Q: You have a paragraph there under the heading Mechanism of cell damage and free radicals.
[....]
The Honorable Judge D. Chasdai: It's on page 16
[....]
A: 16, Yes Yes Yes
Q: I'm telling you that this paragraph is from page 4 of your opinion in Kishon. You agree with me?
A: Again, what are you saying to me? Which she is?
Q: That paragraph was copied from the beginning of page 4 of the opinion on the Kishon matter.
A: It can definitely be.
Q: Okay, and I'll tell you The same goes for the table from Rubin On which several pages are quoted. Is that correct?
A: Yes, it's the same radicals.
Q: But, as well as a description of the penetration of pollutants into the human body