A: Yes, Rothman's
Q: The Cookie Model It makes it possible to make qualitative determinations Retrospectiveness of a causal connection, But using this model, if I understand correctly, Anonymous A prospective assessment can be done of the degree of risk that a particular factor will cause the disease. Is that correct? This model.
A: I understand exactly what you're asking because I'll say right, I agree, okay.... I didn't deal with it, it doesn't appear in the reviews at all, so maybe it's a shame, not to deal with the possibility of doing it.
(See also his testimony at length at pp. 823-824; and also: paragraphs 103 and 108 of the respondents' summaries).
- In the context of the prospective examination, and as the expert himself noted in most fairness, in the Kishon trial: "....I couldn't convince Judge Ron Shapira, I didn't succeed [....] And then Ron Shapira writes, and rightly so, he writes that in order to identify, in order to identify a factor as a risk factor, you have to assess the conditions and conduct surveys and find the risk and confirm that it is a risk factor for cancer, this is the prospective, this is the risk, risk is always probabilistic, always always prospective."
- It should be noted that in his interrogation Lin confirmed that the aforementioned theory regarding the qualitative causal relationship is correct for a group, but for each and every individual there is a need for an individual examination as to his risk of illness (p. 369).
- As for the scholar Luddish on whom the expert relied in addition to his knowledge as quoted above, the pages produced from the aforementioned book Mollecular Cell Biology (see Exhibit M/30) do not assist the expert in establishing the thesis that he presented in support of the applicants' request, which is not concerned, inter alia, with compensation for causing damage to the DNA. . (See also section 119 for the respondents' summaries).
- Lin testified in his interrogation, among other things, that Ludish's book is about molecules, and he referred to pages 3-4, where we are talking about mechanisms and damage to DNA.. According to him later and from the qualitative retrospective aspect:
Q: Exposure to a single molecule or a tiny concentration of a carcinogen is more than fifty-one percent.