The witness, Dr. Zamir F. Q.: True.
Q: The damage caused by each material separately, right?
A: That's right.
Q: That is, to illustrate, if I take pollutant A whose damage is said to be about 2 and pollutant B whose damage is equal to 3, So synergistic damage will be more, synergistic will be more than five
A: Yes.
Q: And additive damage will be 2 + 3, there will be 5.
A: True.
Q: Now, there may also be the possibility that Substance A and Substance B that are in the mixture in the air, for example, There is no interaction and there is no meaning to the connection between them. True?
A: Absolutely..
Q: Absolutely. So basically this field that examines the interaction of substances or toxins when they act together in a mixture of substances, is an area in which you are an expert?
A: Anonymous.
Q: Not an expert in it. So everything you say about synergy in your opinion is not in your area of expertise?
A: True.
- The expert was also referred to the article to which he referred in his first opinion, by the scholar Carpenter, and he was asked and answered as follows:
Q: And you refer to his article and also bring his summary of his article on page 55 to the supplementary or main opinion? The main. Now look, come, come, let's see what he says Professor Carpenter On this matter, because you quoted, quoted and wrote that this is an excellent article, and it says there about Synergism, in the extreme cases there may be synergetic effects. I mean, Professor Carpenter Says it's an extreme case that there will be synergyNot in many cases, right?
A: That's what he says, yes.
Q: That's what he says. And you accept what he says, even if it's not your area of expertise, and you also say he's an expert and the article is excellent, so you accept what he says?
A: Yes, but the American Environmental Protection Agency doesn't just talk about extremism, but about many cases, some of which I mention in the opinion.