Q: The H. Agency The Agency, which agency?
A: U.S. Environmental Agency.
Q: In your opinion, you referred to some statement by the American agency that in many cases says. Yes?
A: I don't remember anymore at the moment.
Q: You don't remember at the moment. I understood.
[....]
A: This is a spelling error, compounds. Mixture, contaminant mixtures.
The Honorable Judge D. Chasdai: Mixes.
A: This is a printing error.
The Honorable Judge D. Chasdai: Is it mixtures or compounds?
A: Contaminant mixtures.
The Honorable Judge D. Chasdai: Okay.
A: There are also compounds among them.
The Honorable Judge D. Chasdai: Mixes.
A: Blends.
The Honorable Judge D. Chasdai: Okay.
A: I didn't see it. This is a spelling error.
Q: Now look, Professor Carpenter also says, And you confirmed that it is true, that different materials can not be between them at all, that you will not be between them at all.
A: Synergism, can be.
Q: Somebody, some kind of reaction.
A: True.
Q: although various substances may have totally independent actions. Right?
A: True, it could be.
The Honorable Judge D. Chasdai: Is this what you read from the abstract? Where do you read this from? From the abstract?
Q: Yes.
A: It could be, absolutely.
Q: And what is antagonism?
A: Antagonism is that one collides with the other, this is a minority of cases, something like this can also happen, that one cancels out the other.
Q: that the combination of two substances creates less damage than the damage done by each of the substances
A: Yes yes yes, something like this can happen.
Q: Right? That could be too.
Adv. Mr. A. Amorai: But that's it, he said, it's speed.
The Honorable Judge D. Chasdai: He said you wouldn't talk, the judge, but in this case, he said you wouldn't speak because he hears and it's being recorded. Thank you. Don't laugh.
Q: And you say in your opinion, you say on page 4, you say that it is also clear that in no case can it be concluded that antagonism between pollutants already cancels out their damage.