In retrospect, plaintiffs 1-2 floated a reflection as to the extent of the justification of their contractual engagement with the transfer of the venue of the Goren hearing and defendant 4. Against the background of the aforesaid, the transfer of the venue of the hearing Goren suggested that they sell their rights in the plots of land to other parties and even profit from it. This was in light of the suggestions he made to move Goren's discussion venue from other mediators. However, plaintiffs 1-2 refused to do so. Mrs. Vyshevsky also said that she consulted with consultants and rabbis who told her that it was unlikely that the administration would redeem the land, and in any case the rabbis told her that she should not withdraw from the deal. It is therefore interpreted that not only did plaintiffs 1-2 sign the agreement with a clear understanding of the set of risks involved in the actual execution of the transactions, but that when in retrospect they were given the opportunity to be released from these transactions, they chose not to do so.
All the transactions were reported as required to the tax authorities, corresponding warning notes were recorded, lease fee debts and consent fees were paid, and then the plots were registered at the Land Registry Office in the name of the purchasers. In any event, in accordance with the decisions of the Israel Lands Authority (as described today), the plaintiffs are entitled to purchase without a tender, about 20% of the building on the various plots. The contracts also state, "The buyer declares that he has seen the property, examined it carefully and found it suitable for him in all respects, that he is aware that the property is agricultural land leased from the manager in accordance with the attached registration wording, and that he purchases it at his sole responsibility based on his own independent examinations and considerations, and not on the basis of any representation on the part of the seller in any matter relating to the property, including the chances of a compromise if at all and/or its consequences. This is after he has carried out all the consultations that he deems necessary, with any entity and/or authority... and he shall not have any claim of any kind whatsoever against the transaction and/or the property and/or the seller and/or Adv. Alon Goren, and that he waives any claim of incompatibility or defect or choice of any kind and type that exists under any law..." (Section 5 of the contracts signed with plaintiffs 1-2; compare: the wording of clause 5 of the contracts signed with plaintiffs 3-7).