During his interrogation, Mr. Horowitz was referred to these documents, while being asked why his son did not draw attention to the fact that their contents herald the possibility of changing the designation from agriculture to urban needs, but not to industry or commerce. To this, Mr. Hurwitz replied that "the things that were conveyed to me were at the level of euphoria, period" (p. 125, paras. 22-23). It is only that Mr. Horowitz "lived in the same euphoria that was promised to me" (his testimony at p. 38, question 34), which "was the euphoria of all of us" (ibid., p. 40, question 5). Mr. Hurwitz further claimed that the plaintiffs "did not read the contract exactly. It's true that a lot of money is invested in this, right? Everyone was in this euphoria... We were not told any warnings or anything" (ibid., 9-13). The euphoria that the plaintiffs had before their eyes, which was repeated over and over again by Mr. Horowitz, indicates the hopes that the plaintiffs had in the purchase, but not the reality that was revealed to them. The plaintiffs insisted, as stated, to remove any question mark or warning light from their path, lest the dream be broken, God forbid.
For the sake of the paper, there was no shortage, I will also note that in the interrogation of Mr. Moshe Horowitz, the son of plaintiff 3 Yaakov Horowitz, he claimed that the transaction "appealed to me" (p. 478, Q. 26), even though he could not meet the seller and does not remember why he did not ask to see the text of the contract in advance (p. 476, Q. 30-32; Ibid., p. 477 (2-4). According to him, "I was drawn to think that this is how the process works..." (p. 478, s. 5). Moshe admitted that before signing the contract, he relied only on what he had heard from his friends, who in turn relied on others, as well as on the documents of the deputy mayor (p. 476, paras. 5-9; ibid., p. 457, paras. 19-22; p. 459, paras. 32-34). In circumstances in which the son of plaintiff 3 testifies that he himself relied on speculation that others "drawn" in front of him, it goes without saying that his father, who was built but from his descriptions, cannot establish concrete and accurate reliance on the actions or omissions of any of the defendants.