Caselaw

Criminal Case (Be’er Sheva) 6901-04-23 State of Israel v. Shuruk Tzaluk - part 6

January 6, 2026
Print

Probation Service Reports:

Defendant 1:

  1. In the Probation Service Report of 01.07.25 The circumstances of defendant 1's life and her personal and family background were detailed.

Defendant 1, 26 years old, divorced without children, lives in Arara in the Negev.  She completed 12 years of study with a matriculation certificate.  In addition, she completed her bachelor's and master's degrees in religious studies at the University of Hebron.

During her studies, she did not work.  After graduating, she worked for only a month as a teacher at a school in Rahat.  It doesn't work today.

According to Defendant 1, the relationship between her and her sister - Defendant 2 is close and deep, and that she has no prior acquaintance with Defendant 3.

Defendant 1 has no previous convictions.

In its report, the Probation Service detailed the risk factors for delinquency in the case of Defendant 1, including:

  1. Employment instability of the defendant and in a manner that increases the risk of repeat offenses in order to achieve quick economic gains.
  2. The defendant's restrictive and downplaying treatment of the offense and the damage it caused.

III.       The characteristics of the offense, including planning and sophistication, and the fact that the defendant is a dominant and active part in the execution and initiative.

  1. The impression that defendant 1 had difficulty examining her conduct and was mainly focused on the personal costs she paid and would pay as a result of the legal proceeding.
  2. An impression of the lack of a family system that supports the defendant.

On the other hand, the Probation Service addressed the factors that are likely to be rehabilitated, including:

  1. The impression is that defendant 1 has the ability to promote herself professionally and has professional aspirations.
  2. The impression is that defendant 1 led a normative and proper lifestyle until the offenses in our case were committed.

III.       The impression that defendant 1 has deterrence following the legal proceedings being conducted against her.

Previous part1...56
7...30Next part