Borrowing from the rulings in the Abergel case, he says that if the investigating unit in his case had used the warrants given to it in order to randomly seize cameras that have nothing to do with the investigation "and to observe private and intimate events of third parties without any restrictions", as the defense fears, there would certainly be room to determine that this is a distorted interpretation of the search warrant, and the disqualification of the evidence collected in this flawed way could have been considered. However, in our case, there was not a shadow of an argument regarding a concrete and disproportionate violation of the privacy of any person - certainly not to the defendant himself, but also to any third party. There was also no claim that any particular camera was illegally seized, without the materials found in it being relevant to the investigation. All that was argued was that since the search warrants were too sweeping, they and all their products should be disqualified, despite the fact that in practice there was no disproportionate infringement of any person's rights. This is a far-reaching and difficult to justify claim, which is not in accordance with the provisions of the law, and it is no wonder that the defense has not been able to provide any support to substantiate such a claim.
Among them, it seems that the defense is seeking to consider the possibility of issuing search and seizure warrants for security cameras by setting a "radius" in which the police may seize any relevant camera. It seems that the current framework is not suitable for a broad discussion of this issue, and we have not heard an orderly argument on this issue from either side. Therefore, I will suffice to note, without setting rivets, that there appear to be cases, such as the present case, in which there is no choice but to issue such an order, in the absence of any possibility of acting as the defense proposes in paragraph 136 of the summaries, i.e., first sending skilled police officers to the various scenes to locate relevant cameras and only then submitting requests for search warrants for specific addresses.