Third, in an intrusion into the defendant's 337 subscriber, 53 searches for information relating to the murder were found, which began only about three hours after the murder was committed and lasted for about half an hour. The verbal content of the searches that were carried out attests to prior knowledge regarding the place where the murder was committed and the identity of the victim, and the intensity of the searches seems to indicate that the searchers are very interested in the aforementioned information, and that they have information that has not yet been disseminated to the public regarding the murder. The defendant himself lied when he was interrogated by the police on this matter and claimed that he did not know about the murder until after he was arrested. In his suppressed testimony in court, he changed his version, but his new version only complicated him, since the only possible explanation that corresponds to his current version of the source of the information once again links him directly to the 685 subscriber, and through him to the Mitsubishi and the murder. The defendant and Odai gave contradictory versions regarding all aspects of the aforementioned searches, and no convincing explanation or weighty evidence was provided that could negate the conclusions required by the logic of the matter, which attest to a close connection between the perpetrators of the searches and the perpetrators of the murder.
Fourth, the defendant is responsible for all the acts he committed prior to his arrest on August 29, 2022, in relation to removing the Mitsubishi from the parking lot where it was kept "in refrigeration" for three days, and loading it onto the tow truck in order to keep it out of the eyes of the police. Although during the course of the police interrogation the defendant denied any connection to these acts, and claimed that he had been innocently arrested by the police, through no fault of his own, and that he had no recollection of what he had done in the hours preceding the arrest, after the investigation team had collected evidence that clearly established the defendant's part in the acts, the defendant retracted these denials in his testimony in court, and confirmed that he had lied throughout his interrogations with the police. and confirmed the descriptions detailed in the indictment in this context. Therefore, there is no longer any dispute today regarding the fact that the defendant picked up his cousins, Udai and Abed, in his car, called the tow driver himself and asked him to come to the Abu Kabir area in order to tow the Mitsubishi, drove with his cousins to the parking lot where the Mitsubishi was being held, where he dropped off Abed, who entered the Mitsubishi and drove it.