Starting at 12:53-12:54, the Mitsubishi makes its way through the streets of Lod towards the scene of the murder, on the route described above. Accordingly, subscriber 685 is prepared at 12:54 in a call that begins on the "Lod" website, whose coverage reaches the vicinity of Jerusalem Blvd. and San Martin Street and ends with the "Neve Alon" website, which covers all the relevant streets on the route to the scene of the murder and the place where the Toyota was set on fire, and where the four additional calls that take place from the 685 subscriber at 12:56-12:57 are also located.
This time, too, as in the connection between the Toyota and the 141 subscriber, there is a complete match between the places where the Mitsubishi is seen in the videos from the security cameras and city cameras and in the documentation from the Hawk's Eye system, and the locations of the 685 subscription, and there is not a single example of a discrepancy in the system. This time, too, and even more intensely, we are talking about demonstrations of compatibility over long hours, in remote geographical areas, and along complex and detailed routes. The possibility that these are random matches and coincidences seems slim to none.
Moreover, the investigation team did not leave these possibilities behind the case, and one of its friends watched, and re-watched, the cameras and videos collected during the investigation, and was unable to locate additional suspicious vehicles that could be attributed to the incident or to any of the operational phones that were located. In this framework, on 6 October 2022, the investigator searched a number of police cameras, at relevant locations and times, both in the morning and at noon, including the Ginton junction to the south and north, Jaffa ad Koch, the Lod interchange to the south/Route 40 and the Ramla traffic junction to the north, and no other suspicious vehicles were found [P/67]. Later, on October 11, 2022, the investigator again viewed all the captured cameras that matched the Mitsubishi track, in an attempt to examine whether there were other vehicles in which the 685 might have been subscribed. Subject to the fact that some of the cameras did not remove long periods of time around the Mitsubishi crossing, and in the low quality of some of the cameras, no relevant findings were found and no suspicious vehicles were located [P/81]. Further viewing of all the cameras seized in the file, which dominate the location of the 685 subscriber, as well as the cameras in which the Mitsubishi was seen, even in cases where there was no location of the 685, did not bring up any additional vehicles in all the scenes where the 685 subscriber was located [P/82]. Indeed, even in the defense summaries, there is no claim regarding the involvement of another vehicle in the events or with regard to the validity of the proven connection between the Toyota and Subscriber 141 and between the Mitsubishi and Subscriber 685. I will now conclude the evidentiary picture on these issues with a brief reference to the timing of the telephone calls and the significance of these dates.