As I have already noted, and I will elaborate on it later, I do not trust the suppressed versions of the defense witnesses, in which an attempt was made to adapt the version to the interrogation materials, and moreover, in the specific context we are now dealing with, there is an inexplicable gap between the defendant's version and Udai's, and the defense also did not bother to support Udai's version with regard to the distribution of information about the murder and with regard to the identity of the victim moving to Haifa to leave. Any additional evidence. The result is that on this issue as well, we are left with objective data that incriminates the defendant and links him to involvement in the murder, including intensive searches for information regarding the murder, the content of which attests to prior knowledge regarding the place where the murder was committed and the identity of the victim. The searches seem to indicate that the searchers are very interested in the aforementioned information, and that they have information that has not yet been disseminated to the public regarding the murder.
The only possible explanation that corresponds to the defendant's version of the source of the information once again links him directly to subscriber 685, and through him to the murder. The Telegram application with a 337 subscription was downloaded only after the search began, and is not the source of information regarding the murder. The defendant and Odai gave contradictory versions regarding the source of the information, and no convincing explanation or weighty evidence was provided that could negate the conclusions required by the logic of the statements and common sense. Therefore, even in the intensive searches that were carried out on the defendant's phone relatively shortly after the murder, there is an additional layer in the body of circumstantial evidence for his duty. I will now take a broader look at the defendant's conduct, first in the interrogation, and later in court, and I will discuss the relevant implications.