Lasri testified, that he is aware of the right to remain silent granted to the defendant, As well as his right to consult a lawyer. Later he noted, As for the right to remain silent, The intention is not to exert unfair emotional pressure on the defendant (pp' 270 Detail', Row 1). Lasri noted, Because they were not allotted time to finish the act of dubbing and were not brought to his attention, Because the police are pressed for time. (pp' 272 Detail', Row 12).
Lasri noted, Because the ancestors of invalidity are, Violence and Threat of Violence, Creating unfair mental stress, Unfair interrogation methods, Promising things and taking measures that include seduction. He also testified, that these improper measures were not taken in the framework of the proceeding here (pp' 271 Detail', Lines 27 -30).
Lasri explained that he behaved inside the cell as a criminal is expected to behave, For that was his job, So it's legitimate to call the interrogee, that he is a minor, "". He didn't sit in the cell as a policeman, But if, With the hat of a criminal and criminals cursing and speaking badly (pp' 284 Detail', Lines 4 -7).
Lasri was asked about the situation that arose inside the cell from which it arises, Because, At some point, The defendant said he didn't want to talk, And then, In response, The Second Dubbed, Shouted at the defendant and pressured him to speak. In addition to this, Lasri was asked to respond, If such conduct, She was worthy in his eyes, and this is how he replied: "In my opinion, this is very normal. In the clearest way possible, I'm a criminal inside the cell, I have my concerns, I would like to know if the person who has just been put into the cell, Is it dubbed or not dubbed. I want to know what he is arrested for, I want to understand who the person in front of me is". (pp' 287 Detail', Lines 12 -15).
- The learned defense attorney directed many questions to the witness and asked for explanations as to the conduct of the informants, from which it is possible to learn about the great pressure they exerted on the defendant immediately after he entered the cell; For example: "So what justified this onslaught?? To call him a and not let him stop talking and use the so-called heaviest criminal hat. After all, you are the truth first, I'm waiting to see if he understands the matter before we step up the so-called gear. Here from what I see, Don't move 5 Minutes and see what the child is snatching from you. He is already being cursed, He's already getting shouted, He already asks to stop talking and they don't let him. Explain to me what he did up to this point that justified it? And I asked you earlier if you were under time pressure." (pp' 288 Detail', Lines 25-18).
Similar, that the witness did not know how to answer this question, A satisfactory explanation and this is how he answered : "As far as I'm concerned, a person comes in and starts telling me by saying that and saying that, This is a person who knows how to conduct himself in a detention cell, How to talk and how not." (pp' 288 Detail', Lines 27-26).
- The presiding judge also, 22' Judge Hellman, referred a question to the witness in the same context, and this is how the matter was reflected in the minutes of the hearing: "He doesn't want to say that he did, He wants to tell you that he is suspected of doing. That's what he said, He said it as clearly as possible. That he is a person who is not a criminal, What's Criminal About It?. I can't understand" (pp' 289 For the record, Lines 4 - 7). In answer to this question, the witness answered: "At that moment, it seemed, The way they dealt with him, She was pretty much fine" pp' 289, Lines 9-8).
- Lasri was interrogated at length in connection with the dubbing process and his attitude toward the defendant. Here is the place to note, Because at a certain point, The second informant turned to the defendant and told him, "Listen or you'll start talking or you don't know what." (A/23a, pp' 13 Row 17). The witness Lasri was asked if he considered it a threat, and he replied in the negative.. As far as he is concerned, This statement does not constitute a threat. (pp' 296 Detail', Row 31-24).
- More in Lasri's testimony:
"Q: Investigator interrogating a minor, Were you allowed to tell him the sentence?, And this is after Nissim screamed at him and screamed at him, And the child says, "I have nothing to say.", Was it permissible for you to tell him that you would talk like a man and that you are my brother everything he asks you?, You will answer.