It should be emphasized; The exact number of stabbings is a well-known detail (This is in contrast to the fact that the deceased was stabbed; In my opinion, It is not a prepared individual, As I mentioned above and as I will detail later) that no one has been exposed to, Except for the investigation team, The medical staff and the real killer. The place where the deceased was stabbed, In practice, Three stabbings, It will be very difficult to accept the defendant's descriptions, which came as part of his confession, Ones that accurately reflect the truth. Kerry - In this context, This is clear, Because the defendant did not tell the truth.
Another question in the same context, ConcerningThe location of the stabbings. When the defendant described stabbings in the back ("I banged my whole back on him" As he said, See - A/23A, pp' 15 Row, 35), Later in the dubbing, he said that the stabbings were in the shoulder and spine (Name, pp' 35, Lines 7 -17); It is evident that the defendant described to the informants the location of the stabbings. But again, In the absence of visual documentation, It is not possible to determine the exact descriptions of the defendant. It turns out that, Lack of visual documentation flawed the court's ability to be exposed, Himself, directly and directly to the defendant's descriptions.
Not only that., From D's opinion"R. Gipps (A/125), It appears that the deceased was stabbed twice in the back and another in the head, Thus it was noted there: A puncture wound was found in the scalp when on the-According to the expert's description, This wound penetrated only the scalp without damage to the skull or brain and did not contribute to the death. This stab in the head was not described by the defendant in his confession to the informants. According to him,, He stabbed the deceased all over the back and nowhere did he mention the stab in the head. It turns out that, On this point as well, His confession does not fully and accurately match the forensic findings at the scene.