It should also be said that the examination also found a stab wound – a cut on the scalp, which penetrated only the scalp, and according to the opinion, did not contribute to the death of the deceased.
The deceased's conduct and actions at the scene of the murder
- As part of the investigation, the police collected statements from people who knew the deceased. The testimonies of these were heard before us, and from them we can learn about the reason for the deceased's presence at the scene of the murder, riding an electric bicycle and the reason why he was masked at the time. In addition, it is possible to learn about a certain lack of clarity and mystery regarding his character, his employment history, and the type of his work.
- Anna Sharvit testified on March 16, 2017, that she knew the deceased about 20 years ago. According to her, they were good friends and he was like a brother to her. On the day of the murder, he was with her for about two hours, since he wanted to consult with her about his relationship (p. 189, lines 3-6). The witness further stated that she was not aware of any disputes between the deceased and others (p. 189, line 28). The witness knew about the deceased's relationship with L., and according to the witness, the deceased was very disappointed and hurt that L. wanted to end the relationship with him. She also said that he wanted to clarify the meaning of the matter and the reason that led L. to terminate this relationship. The witness also noted, in the course of her cross-examination, that the deceased was a mysterious person in the sense that she knew nothing about him (p. 190, line 13). The witness stated that she did not know for sure what he was dealing with or what people he was dealing with (p. 190, lines 16-19). The witness answered in the affirmative to the question addressed to her by the defense attorney, as follows: "And from your acquaintance with him, you said that he was always alone, and you never, and he would always work at night and come back from travel, and he would tell me that he worked with the army(p. 194, lines 10-11).
- In the testimony of Jack Sasson on April 5, 2017, he testified that the deceased was a friend of his, like an older brother. The witness said that the day before the murder, on the morning of 20 January 2017, the deceased called him and told him about the relationship he had with a girl he had fallen in love with. Yes, the deceased went on to say to the witness that someone had defamed him in front of that girl, which caused that girl, whom he had fallen in love, to distance himself from him. Later in the conversation, the witness said: "And then a few seconds after that, someone passed by, called him, and then he kind of turned to him, did a hi to him, and said to me, well, Jacques, I have to run, shook my hand and ran to this friend, to someone who passed by right there, and that's it" (p. 213, lines 12-14). Later, the witness, who was not aware of any disputes that the deceased had with others (p. 213, lines 22-25).
As part of his cross-examination, the witness was asked about the person who passed nearby and called the deceased. However, he did not know how to provide details about him. He further stated that he had no information regarding the deceased's occupations. He did know that the deceased was engaged in all sorts of secret, covert things (p. 214, lines 19-20). According to him, he never asked the deceased about his occupations, and if it happened that he asked about it, then the deceased avoided answering. The witness added that he knew that the deceased had worked in the civil service, and nothing more. (p. 215, lines 5-7).