In the course of her testimony before me on December 2, 2025, Fatmeh was asked about the civil proceedings she conducted against the defendant, Majda, the Israel Police and the forfeiture unit, and the judgment obtained as part of the opening injunction on 20-04-2010 (filed and marked H/2). This is an agreed notice that was submitted to the court with a request to give it the force of a judgment, and the court granted the request. In the judgment of February 21, 2021, it was agreed that some of the funds seized in the criminal proceedings by the defendant and held in the forfeiture unit would be transferred to Fatma.
- Inmar Hasson - the victim of the offense that is the subject of the fourth indictment in the main case. An "affidavit of receipt without consideration" was submitted in his case, with consent, through Adv. Tayseer Hasson, which was marked H/4. In the framework, he noted that he has no demand and/or claim and/or claim whatsoever against the defendant and does not ask for compensation. At the end of his affidavit, he asked that this be taken into account and that his sentence be reduced.
- Bassem Rushdi Halabi - the victim of the offense that is the subject of the sixth indictment in the main case. An "affidavit of receipt without consideration" was submitted in his case, with consent, through Adv. Tayseer Hasson, which was marked H/3. In the framework, he noted, "I have received all my rights in the land, and I own the land. There is no demand and/or claim and/or claim whatsoever against Attorney Shakib Abu Ruken and I am not asking for any compensation." At the end of his affidavit, he asked that this be taken into account and that his sentence be reduced.
- Jamal Kayuf - the victim of the offense that is the subject of the seventh and eighth indictments in the main case. An affidavit of an offense victim was filed in his case, which was submitted and marked H/7 and appendices related to the affidavit were submitted and marked H/8. In the affidavit, Jamal noted that the defendant had deceived him in the process of purchasing the land from the Avlini family (eighth charge), acted against him, prevented him from issuing building permits for the construction of a building on the land, filed false claims against him relating to the land, and caused him high expenses and great mental anguish. In addition, he claimed that in a case in which the defendant represented him and Atef Saker (seventh charge), the defendant acted fraudulently, filed a false report with the tax authorities, and as a result, was forced to pay much higher tax amounts than the tax he would have paid.
In support of the aspirant in the seventh indictment , Jamal submitted the original sale agreement between him and Saker and the forged documents that were not signed by the parties, in which it was stated that a smaller part of the land was sold, without the warehouse on it and at a lower price than the price at which it was sold (see Appendices 7, 8 and 9).