They further claimed that the defendant acts with a lack of transparency in relation to its various decisions and actions, including the selection of coaches for the Israeli national teams, the selection of referees in competitions, the selection of staff members in the various Israeli teams, and much more.
The plaintiffs claim that the defendant is acting unlawfully in everything related to the admission of new members to the association, or the rejection of the applications of others to join, and regarding its financial conduct.
Therefore, they filed the lawsuit in which they seek to grant relief as follows:
"A. to provide declaratory relief that the plaintiffs are entitled to be registered as members of the defendant;
- to issue an injunction obligating the defendant to register the plaintiffs as members;
III. To provide declaratory relief according to which everyone involved in the sport of Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu, and in general
Trainees, coaches, owners of institutes, etc., will be entitled to register as members of the defendant;
- Without derogating from the aforesaid, to issue an injunction instructing the defendant to respond to any request to join it in writing within seven days, and to the extent that such a request is refused to give full reasons".
- In the framework of Civil Case 12265-09-23, [Nevo] It was argued, inter alia, that the defendant harassed the plaintiff (hereinafter also: "Glam"), and this, in continuation of "... The defendant's bullying conduct...", and as the defendant usually acts"... against coaches and club owners who "dared" to revolt against the conflicts of interest in the country, despite the fact that it is a public body supported by public funds, when the plaintiff is the main victim of a series of unacceptable and serious steps".
Copied from Nevo
It was claimed that the defendant began her abuse of the plaintiff back in 2023, when she decided, ex parte, and without hearing the plaintiff, not to allow him to enter the "... The coaches' area has halls where the association's competitions are held for 24 months", because she claimed that she did not obey the instructions of the security personnel during a competition held on June 9, 2023, and made statements towards the security personnel, according to her, "... In harsh words, which include threatening allusions, except for the curses" - A decision, which, according to the plaintiff, is contrary to the provisions of the Sports Law which requires a disciplinary proceeding before an objective disciplinary body, and in blatant violation of the rules of natural justice. It was clarified that the significance of the decision was a fatal blow to the plaintiff's trainees who train under his guidance, during the competitions, and to the plaintiff himself.