Moreover, the defendants refer to the testimony of the plaintiff in the framework of her cross-examination, in which she confirmed that in order to deposit additional funds (the sum of £44,000 and an additional sum of £200,000) she approached the executor of her father's estate - Paul Clarke (see her testimony on page 44, lines 12-14 and yes, her testimony on page 45) who refused to transfer funds to her (ibid.), since it was a venture investment and moreover, He referred her to a lawyer for advice (see the plaintiff's testimony, page 57, lines 31-34). Despite all this, there is no dispute that the plaintiff added and transferred additional funds for the purpose of investing in OFM (a fact that is not in dispute and is supported by the plaintiff's printout of actions that was attached by the defendants - CRM), since she claimed that she was told that it was a recovery account. As to this claim, I will note that in the course of her testimony I made it difficult for the plaintiff and asked how she thought that her money would be returned to her as part of a "convalescence account", given that in the account as aforesaid, the conduct is also the same - that is, the return of the money is through trade, which has already caused considerable losses. As for this, I asked - what is special about this calculation that could have led to a change in trend? The problem is that the plaintiff did not know how to answer the difference between a convalescence account and a regular account, and yes, she did not provide any satisfactory answer to these questions (see page 67, lines 7-21).
Moreover, the plaintiff confirmed in her testimony that even after she withdrew all her money from OFM (a few thousand dollars), she again invested in binary options, considerable sums, and inter alia did so through a company whose representative told her that he had come to her following an OFM recommendation (see the affidavit of answers to the questionnaire she gave - N/15 and her testimony on pages 63-66 and specifically from line 28 on page 65 to line 10 on page 66).