Later in the letter, Lehavot is required to urgently convene working meetings with the relevant parties in order to discuss how to get the agreement back on track, to "reduce the damages" caused to Danan as a result of the violations, and to "compensate" Dan for the damages so far due to the violations, including with regard to the fire extinguishing systems on the buses (M/133, para. 6).
- The picture that emerges from the Bible is that a difficulty arose from the beginning regarding the bus sector, a difficulty that led Lehavot to note in July 2016 that there would be no sales of bus systems by Danan ("perhaps at a later stage after the market stabilizes", M/63), without Danan's response or reservation.
At the same time, the bus sector as a whole has not been completely removed from the agenda. The area was mentioned in a meeting held in September 2016, and in the same month Danan also signed a development agreement regarding an area that according to it was intended to be used for the purpose of providing bus service (M/136; p. 240, paras. 4-19). The bus sector was also mentioned in the correspondence between the parties from November 2016 and during 2017[4]. It appears that throughout the period, the parties have acted, in cooperation of one kind or another, with the intention or hope that the conduct will be on a proper track and that it will be possible to act to promote the activity in question in the field of buses. In practice, some activity was also carried out by Danan in the field, but it was limited and did not last long.
- The Evidentiary Material Reflecting Danan's agreement to postpone and gradually begin activity in the bus sector (as opposed to giving up this activity entirely), in the hope that it will be possible in the future. This conclusion It is also consistent with what is stated in Danan's statement of claim, according to which in July 2016 Lehavot announced that Danan would not accept the bus sector, and that Danan "was left with no choice but to 'swallow the bitter pill' and continue to honor the agreement on its part (even though it did not give its consent to reduce this activity). Klil from the agreement)" (My emphasis - T.A. ), in the hope that the exclusivity in the second stage of the agreement will reward it (paragraphs 15-16 of the statement of claim).
- The testimonies that were heard did not contradict the The aforementioned and sat down with him.
"A: I don't remember, for a moment, that I gave up on the issue of buses. I can say that Shalhavot all along, they tried to thwart it because of their lack of consciousness, of the agreement, with Mr. Misha. And we swallowed the pill, until the day came [...]"