And to you, my wife, there are no words to describe my appreciation and admiration for you for all the time we went through. Thank you for every moment by your side, I couldn't have wished for a stronger, more supportive and loving woman than you for me, and a more perfect mother than you for our daughter. I love you forever and after! And I wish us from the bottom of our hearts that all our lives together we will grow, achieve, love, and raise our children on our values."
The defendant's mother posted that the toddler was the product of their joint labor (Appendix 6, p. 55 to the exhibits file); and so did the plaintiff's mother (Appendix 6, p. 58 to the exhibits file).
The defendant in her cross-examination admitted the words, claimed that they may have been said during "euphoria" (as she put it) and in moments of joy, and claimed that this did not change the fact that she was her own child, when the plaintiff was her partner in the relationship at the time and nothing more.
- Regarding the manner in which the minor called the plaintiff, it appears from the testimonies that the minor called the defendant "mother" and the plaintiff "my mother". The plaintiff claims that this is a maternal nickname, while the defendant claims that it is only an affectionate nickname, and these are her words (at p. 49 of the transcript):
"Q. Referring to our p. 287, regarding the birthday of A. Your sister writes, "Always remember that all of us, especially Mom & Mom Yours is always here by your side for anything you need."
- As a couple, that's my answer. It's going to repeat itself every time. Posts don't qualify a person to be a mother. To the court's question, this is a reference to the minor's case, I reply that my mother is a nickname, a nickname. We have a mother B And Mother B "
The same is true in the continuation of her testimony (p. 46 of the transcript)
"Q. Referring to p. 125 of our exhibits, Appendix 11. On the birthday of -(The plaintiff) You write, "There is no doubt that it was the happiest birthday of my life! Alongside my wife, who is the anchor of my life And our daughter That we waited so long for you to join..."
- There are all kinds of words at certain moments that were pulled out of the sleeve in moments of joy, of a little more love between us, and they were just pulled out like that. In the end, it comes down to a Facebook post and another post, but the bottom line is that I didn't want to, we didn't want to, she didn't want to And there was no discussion between us about anchoring her parenthood in any way.
- You said a few messages, but there are over a hundred. On p. 140 there isA. Birthday and you write, "Mom and Mom love you to the core." Still my mother, that is,(The plaintiff) Not her mother?
- I will refer to the word my mother. My second daughter is at an age who begins her first pronunciations and her first murmurs. The blessing on behalf of me and my partner who is called her -(The plaintiff) And the minor calls her my mother. I wanted to dwell on the word "mother." There was her first pronunciation when she was a baby and also in the report it is written that the minor calls her these words, so this nickname was caught. Nickname or nickname It doesn't make her a mother."
- The defendant admits that the minor called the plaintiff's parents "grandparents", but claims that this is an affectionate nickname, and these are her words (at p. 47 of the transcript):
- On page 203 you write, "You will continue to be a couple of kind-hearted, warm and pampering people, grandparents, warm and warm and devoted parents." You go on to write, "From me and fromA. ". i.e. a' Sees the parents of:(The plaintiff) Grandparents, right?
- I called them grandparents from the place of older people, people we know, people we stayed with, yes we know them. They loved me and the minor, but they knew it was mine. The fact that I called them grandparents and used those words are nicknames. There's an elderly woman I go to every holiday because she's childless, and when I go into her house or bring her a holiday gift, I say hello to her, Grandma.
The plaintiff's mother also testified about the family WhatsApp group called "There is No One Like Grandparents", about the warm relationship between her and the minor, and about the sorrow over the distance created with the separation of the spouses (p. of transcript 97). The plaintiff's sister also testified about the nicknames that the minor used towards members of her extended family (p. 91 of the transcript). In addition, she testified about the warm relationship with the minor whom she saw as a niece for all intents and purposes, about the bracelet she purchased for her when she reached the age of two, about the joint games and the sorrow of separation (p. 79 of the transcript).