Caselaw

Family Case (Tel Aviv) 31661-07-16 Anonymous v. Anonymous - part 23

July 2, 2025
Print

The Man:         Yes, that's where I have to focus.  The Nebraska Company that is under trust, I have never had control of it, I have never had a position and I have never had signing rights.  There is another Nebraska company with a similar name in Jurisdiction, which was a shelf company similar to a company Oklahoma at another time, in which I did have a signing.  In other words, there is no connection between the two companies.  It's a company located inJurisdiction, it is also written differently, it has nothing to do with the Nebraska that appears here in the trusts or the Nebraska that is invested in the start-up company.

The wife's counsel:      I'm telling you that this whole thing about having two Nebraska companies is some kind of smokescreen that you decided to tell us about.  And I'm telling you that you're the owner of a Nebraska company and it could be now you're confusing us with all sorts of statements.  So that's why I'm asking you in a focused way, is it true that you're in the framework of the FBAR Have you filled out forms regarding Nebraska company as well?

The man:         There were two parts to your question, I'll answer them part by side. 

  1. I'm not confused.  I'm trying to clarify that it's not suddenly and it's not that, and that's exactly the answer.  Your second question is whether in-FBAR That a Nebraska company appears, it could very well be precisely because of this reason that the Nebraska company is the company that was really under my control that I had a bank account on, which is actually a shelf company that is like an Oklahoma company.  i.e.  there is no connection between the Nebraska company that appears on my tax returns onFBAR To the Nebraska company you know in this portfolio that is invested in all the companies that are in a trust.  There is no connection between the two.

The wife's counsel:      It just so happens that two companies are called the same thing.

The man:         They're not exactly the same, and it's not a coincidence that it's in the other Jurisdiction Different, but the word - in the case here has nothing to do with the matter.

Previous part1...2223
24...36Next part