The wife's counsel: Who are the shareholders of each of the companies?
The man: Everyone's? Which companies?
The wife's counsel: You claim that there are several Nebraska companies,
The man: No, no,
The wife's counsel: So come and tell us.
The man: Two, not a few. Two companies with similar names. The Nebraska Company,
The wife's counsel: A similar name? What name did the second have?
The man: Again, show me them,
The wife's counsel: No, you'll show me, you'll show me. What are companies called by a similar name?
The man: Please let me answer your question that you asked who the owner was. Let's focus, the Nebraska company that is in the trust that actually appears in all the investments that actually had most of the losses in the other trusts, I don't remember if Nebraska is [In Arizona] Or [in Nevada], but she's in one of those two. Let's take Nebraska, for example, which invested in Dion, or in 365 Technologies, or in a company called Gagg. It's a company held by trust, I had no control, no signing rights, no position in Nebraska, nothing. Now about the second Nebraska, which is a company that closed years earlier, it's a shelf company, it's a company that I think didn't exist anymore in 2010, it didn't exist at all, it's a company that was very similar to,
The wife's counsel: What is this similar company called?
The man: The name is similar to Nebraska but I don't have the document, but that's what I see in theFBAR Or something like that.
The wife's counsel: Let me tell you. What is written inFBAR It's Like this, it says: "Nebraska Company",
The man: Okay.
The wife's counsel: So what,
The man: Do you want to show For me?
The wife's counsel: How is Nebraska different from Nebraska, just explain to us.
The man: Do you want to show me theFBAR?
The wife's counsel: No, I want you to tell me how Nebraska is different from Nebraska? Do you want the court to believe that these are two different companies?