The man: I'm sure the court will understand that these are two different companies, especially when they see the share certificates of these two companies.
The wife's counsel: Yes, can you show me in your affidavit where you attached all the documents related to the Nebraska company so that a court can figure it out?
The man: Okay. Nebraska Company of which I was the controlling shareholder and which appears onFBAR It is a company that was dissolved and closed already in the region of 2010, 2011 years before,
The wife's counsel: Yes, show me the document.
The man: Years before,
The wife's counsel: Show me the document.
A: I don't have these documents because the separation was in 2016. And don't forget that at the time of the separation, my house was broken into and all the documents were taken out of my house by [A. and the wife], so even if I had documents, they were taken from my house.
The wife's counsel: Yes, and?
The man: That's the answer." (See transcript of November 24, 2020, pp. 913, 18-26, pp. 914-915 and 916, 1-22, emphases unsourced).
- This strategy is reminiscent of the method of changing the man's name and biasing him in various documents in order to achieve his goals. It is clear that the man is a genius, but at the same time it is clear that he thinks that the court, and for this matter all other people, are absolute fools and can be fooled by sweeping arguments that devoid of any support. In one hand the man says that the court will believe his version when he sees the share certificates of the two companies, and in the other hand he says that he has no document on the matter, and if he had it - it was stolen by the woman and her representative.
- In order not to leave the readers of this judgment in suspense, I will preface the latter by saying that in the course of the legal proceeding, the woman was able to show that the Nebraska Company was protected under the Arizona Trust, which itself is under the control of the man. In this regard, the man's own words were quoted in a correspondence with a representative of the Vermont Subscription Management Company in March 2014 (see Appendix 67 to the woman's summaries):
"Nebraska S.A and that I was the sole director, sole beneficial owner and sole signatory on its bank accounts"