In this case, I would mean maybe the same style."
(Pro. of May 8, 2017, p. 321, paras. 17-31).
And later on:
"The defendant: In this particular case, I played it, as it were, I can know or feel about the weapons, maybe we will succeed and make a deal. But in practice, I didn't know about the weapons of the affair itself."
"Q. How would you bring, You don't know anything?
- About Hamel"8 Himself I knew nothing.. But when you give an option, you go and feel here and there.".
(Pro. of May 8, 2017, p. 322, paras. 23-24).
"Q. I ask you again what was the logic behind your claim that you did as if, You've played, You lied to the interrogators, And you acted as if you had hope."8 Do you want to explain, With the help of an interpreter for this purpose, we stopped the discussion?
- I didn't lie to the investigators, As for luck, you're deceiving me., You said investigators, Say the Lucky Researcher.
...
- I didn't lie, I supposedly know, But the one who ousted me...
...
"Q. Did you tell her or didn't tell her that the one who stole was Adi?
- I don't know, Because I don't know. I don't know if they stole or not, The Truth.
- Did you tell Mazal that the one who stole was Adi and Shadi or did you not tell Mazal?
- I don't remember"
(Pro. of May 8, 2017, p. 333, paras. 29-32).
Later on, the court again asked for an answer on this matter, and the defendant responded:
"To the court's question of what you would do here if they had agreed to the deal you wanted, I answer that it didn't work. We might have made progress, maybe we'll be sent to find out if there's a way to do it."
(Pro. of May 8, 2017, p. 335, paras. 21-25).
Later, when asked why he said things that could incriminate him, the defendant says :
"To the question of why you said that, I answer that I was convinced that it was a conversation. I flowed, she said, and I flowed with luck. She invents and I continue. It begins."
(Pro. of May 8, 2017, p. 334, paras. 17-22).