Arriving at the scene of the murder in flip-flops with a personal cell phone, a personal car and a locator - among the evidence presented as aforesaid was also the words of defendant 2 during his interrogation - P/12B, when he claimed in a spontaneous voice that: "No matter where I know we are going to do such a thing, I would take my phone and drive in my car....... with Ituran" (ibid., p. 42, paras. 6-13). As it turned out from the aforesaid evidence, when the defendant drove south and met with Muhammad in the area of Lakiya before the murder, defendant 2 did indeed carry his cell phone on him and he also drove to the place in his car with the Ituran device installed on it, and arrived at the Dor Alon station wearing flip-flops and light clothes, facts that will strengthen his claim that when he arrived at the "Dor-Alon" station in Lakiya and the meeting point, he did not intend to be part of a murder operation. (This is also evidenced by the response of the interrogator, who responded and said that this was strange to him as well.)
Moreover, as stated above, Muhammad, for his part, chose to act with great "sophistication", while trying to conceal details, he brought the "Mazda" car from the Occupied Territories to be used for the murder, and he also chose to leave his phone in Lod and was assisted by an "operational" phone at the time of the murder, and he even tried to arrange pictures at a gas station that would serve as an "alibi" for him and burned the Mazda car, and in normal circumstances it is reasonable to assume that if Muhammad had told Defendant 2 that it was a trip for the purpose of murder, He would also have made sure that the defendant would have arrived without his phone, and would have concealed his involvement and taken care of him and defendant 3 in advance for an alibi.
The fact that Muhammad left defendant 2 to act "amateurishly" when committing his acts, while exposing himself (Muhammad) to the fear of being revealed, will strengthen to a certain extent the possibility that this was not done by chance, and in fact during the management of the events, Muhammad chose to conceal from defendant 2 the true purpose of the acts (while risking exposing himself and the defendant), or out of fear that the defendant would "talk" if he shared the secret of the matter. Or out of fear that the defendant (who has no criminal record) will refuse to cooperate if he is told that the purpose of the acts is to kill another, and in fact he "used" the defendant as a tool to carry out his actions, while deceiving him in a story about stealing drugs, without telling him the truth.