In addition, Defendant 1 confirms that he made a connection between Frizzi and Avi Kalamaro, in light of Frizzi's request to consult with an expert in the field of computers.
In the testimony of the two men in this case, suppressed versions were given, and there is no truth in their claim that the person who took the goods was defendant 1.
In light of the aforesaid, as claimed in the summaries of defendant 1, the prosecution did not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant stole the goods, in which charges 3-7 are involved, and certainly did not use forged stamps and signatures or other forged documents.
With regard to the allegations of an illegal reduction in tax payments by filing false customs accounts, it was argued that these statements have no basis in reality and logic.
Since defendant 1 was not the orderer of the goods and its owners, he was not supposed to bear the payment of the release taxes, and therefore, he could not derive any profit from the illegal reduction of the tax payments.
As far as the payment of VAT is concerned, there is no logic in reducing the amounts, since a tax appeal can be offset, so that any payment of a tax appeal for the release of goods can be offset against a tax appeal for the sales royalties.
At the end of the introductory chapter, a general reference appears to the various "key players" and their interest in reducing their responsibility and incriminating Defendant 1. This section refers to the following personalities: Araldo Friesi, Avi Kalamaro, Kobi Zoaretz and Avi Ben-Nissan, Meir Ephraim and Pini Basson.
As for the merchant Karim in the wall, defendant 1 claims that he is an Arab customer who was introduced to him through Shlomo Metok. Bekir introduced himself as the person behind a business called "Mand Electric", which specializes in importing electrical appliances. He also presented himself in the wall as having connections in the Palestinian Authority and as someone who sometimes imports goods for institutions and companies in the Palestinian Authority.