The prosecution further claims that during his interrogation (P/321), defendant 1 admitted that plan accounts attached to the import records were forged in order to reduce the amount of import taxes, and tried to place the responsibility on Elhanan Tenenbaum and a fictitious figure named "Avi Stavitzky".
The prosecution rejects Defendant 5's version, according to which he only provided Piccolo Line with office and financing services, since it claims that Defendant 5 managed the company and acted on its behalf vis-à-vis the supplier Opsa, and even with large customers in Israel. He even charged oil management fees, withdrew most of its income from the company, and treated it as an owner. As part of the summaries, the prosecution agreed that the OPCI of Avi Kalmaro was not involved in the transactions, except for making her bank account available for the opening of the first letter of credit, and hence her withdrawal from the charge against defendant 4.
The prosecution argues that there is no dispute with the defendants that the import permits submitted to the Customs are false, even though the defendants denied these facts in the indictment. There is also no dispute that the import records were submitted through the customs brokers who provided services to the Piccolo company-The lawsuit further claims that the imported goods were subject to purchase tax and appeal at that time Taxes In imports, and therefore by submitting the false bills, the intention is to evade import taxes. It was further argued that all the defendants are joint perpetrators and are the main criminals.
The acts attributed to Defendant 1 are the issuance of the forged and false supplier accounts on behalf of Plans and their delivery to Yigal Fadlon; Issuance of fictitious invoices in the name of Savilla Trading in Appeal Taxes and their delivery to defendants 5 and 6 or any of them; Receiving checks drawn by Piccolo-line to the Seville Order, stamping the stamps of the Tesav and withdrawing the funds in cash; Submission of Danidov VAT reports.