The witness was asked why the defendant was not allowed to give a version or additional testimony under a warning to him, he
Reply, that the defendant asked to provide the materials and that it was his decision not to receive the materials in the framework of the
Investigation or Testimony.
The witness was asked if he had training in automotive computers (CDR) and answered in the negative..
When asked if he would have seized the two computers of the two vehiclesHe replied that if necessary, yes, but it depends on the year, the model and whether it is relevant to the investigation.
Examiner Vladi contradicts this, that the examiner Maayan who conducted the field of vision test in the case rejected the version of the neutral witnesses and that he was confronting the defendant with the testimony of a witness that the examiner had rejected, he replied that he saw fit to accuse the defendant of this, whether the examiner denied it or otherwise related to the testimony of the eyewitness.
He testified again, that the defendant wanted to provide materials as part of a testimony under warning and that he exercised discretion not to receive materials as part of an interrogation under warning, except in an accompanying letter.
He testified, because the next day the defendant came with the letter and the CD.
Prosecution Witness No. 10 - 200"Rabbi Maayan Tsabari
As part of his testimony in the main interrogation, the following documents were submitted and their contents were submitted:
Examiner Report, submitted and marked P/29 (8 pages).
Damage Adjustment Appendix Report of Day 124.24. Submitted and marked P/30.
Sketch, submitted and marked P/31.
Photo board, submitted and marked P/32 (28 photos).
Two enlarged photographs from a photo board (M/32), submitted and marked, P/33A, P/33B.
Test disc (including images, Damage Adjustment, Body Camera Videos, Field of Vision Experiment, Arena
The Accident, Recordings of Focus and Directions of Travel), was submitted and marked P/34.
Calculating the location of vehicle B involved in the collision lane, filed and marked P/35 (2 pages, second leaf -
Photos).
Field of Vision Experiment, submitted and marked P/36 (4 pages, including photos).
Scale Chart, submitted and marked P/37.
Action report prepared by the examiner, filed and marked P/38 (2 pages of April 12,2023).
Memorandum drawn up by the examiner dated 74.23. Viewing the videos, submitted and marked P/39.
Memorandum drawn up by the examiner of 274.23. Submitted and marked P/40.
Body Camera Insights Report (Linked to Exam Disc P/34), submitted and marked P/41.
A memorandum drawn up by the examiner in a call center 44"A" (the last part of the memorandum), was submitted and marked P/42.
The interrogation of the defendant collected by the examiner from day 25.23. Submitted and marked P/43 (7 pages).
The Defendant's Interrogation Disc of Day 25.23. Submitted and marked P/44.