The following is a breakdown of some of the aforementioned in the documents submitted as part of the testimony of Examiner Maayan:
In the Examination Report - P/29, the following main points were determined:
Visual field tested From a mobile device, it is tested and measured in a reset pulley - in relation to the two vehicles
Those Involved - "This is a dark road with no lighting, so the distance that can be seen ahead is light
Through - 30 meters."
The conditions of the air gas and visibility at the time of the case/test: "Night, rainy, poor visibility."
The Road and its Monument - Non-urban road: "A wet and proper asphalt road, two-way, lane in every direction,
Separation line from Koko, No curbs (narrow), No road lights, Maximum speed limit 80
100"Q."
The findings and their significance: "After the scene of the accident was washed away, fresh grooves were found in the center
Vehicle B lane oriented vertically/diagonally in the direction of travel. In the examination of the underbelly of a car
B, marks of abrasion and asphalt remnants were found on the lower bridge - based on this finding, it can be determined that
The collision occurred in the lane of vehicle B."
Signs of braking, tire friction, conclusions, and speed determination: "A - no tire marks found
At the scene of the accident. In B. It was not possible to extract data from the C.D.R component regarding the speed of vehicle A passing
For an accident."
Conclusions: "... I arrived at the scene and found the vehicles and the scene as documented in the sketch. About
On the basis of the evidence, I determined that:
1. Vehicle A was driving on Route 3415 from west to east.
2. Car B on Route 3415 from east to west.
3. Cancellation of Administrative Fine 8.1 Vehicle A swerved from its lane to the opposite lane and collided head-on with vehicle B.
5. After the collision, vehicle A turned and stopped on its original lane with the front facing
West, vehicle B was pushed into the ditch on the right in the direction of its travel, and stopped with its front facing south.
...
9. At the scene of the accident, fresh grooves were found in the center of the lane of vehicle B, oriented at
Vertical/diagonal to the direction of travel. In an examination of the underbelly of vehicle B, marks were found on the lower bridge
Rubbing and asphalt residue.
10. An eyewitness, Ayalon Zadok, who was driving behind Vehicle B, stated in his testimony that Vehicle B overtook him for a short time
Before the accident, he drove behind car B at a speed of 70 km/h at a fixed distance, there was no rain
At the time of the accident And there was good visibility, he noticed a car A swerving into their lane (he thought it was an accident
TinA) and collides head-on with vehicle B. It is also reported that vehicle B tried to swerve to the left before
Collision.
11. From a field of vision test conducted at the site of the accident in order to check what Ayalon Zadok can see
It emerged that the driver behind the second vehicle, can clearly see the markings on the road, the direction of the
Vehicle Traffic B, but cannot see for sure which lane Car A is traveling in when it exits
From the CurveBut if vehicle A is driving in its own lane, the witness will see its headlights, and if
Vehicle A will swerve and move into the opposite lane, it will be hidden behind Vehicle B.
...
14. Vehicle A was caught in the airbag computer in order to check the last speed of vehicle A passing
for an accident and to understand whether due to a speed that does not match the road conditions, the car was "thrown" out of the round
Out of the lane of car B since as far as car A is concerned, the place of the accident is at the end of the curve
to the right and in terms of vehicle B, the scene of the accident is still aligned., but due to the lack of the proper cable, no
The information on the airbag computer can be unloaded.
15. In the center of the vehicle lane of car B, fresh and deep grooves were found in the asphalt, and they were formed when
Vehicle B was hit by Vehicle A and the vehicle's lower shield came into contact with the road when Vehicle B "Went down
Bottom" during the collision. These grooves indicate that the collision itself occurred
In Lane B.
Conclusion: In light of the above, , I determine that the driver of car A drove carelessly and recklessly
and the accident was caused by the driver of car A swerving from his lane to the opposite lane.