When the defendant was told that his answer did not match the testimony of the witnesses, it was with me the husband of the driver involved And Ayalon Zadok, he replied that it was not true and testified:
"A. The person in charge of the investigation file, Maayan Tsabari, rejected the testimonies of the Zadok family, Israel Zadok, Ayalon Zadok, conducted a field of vision experiment and brought findings that negate the testimony of the aforementioned witnesses.
On the other handAyalon Zadok testified that he saw a car driving 20 meters in front of him, swerving and it was written in the minutes, and the accuser does not relate to this existing fact. I know that you are not satisfied with my answers.
...
Q. Ayalon testified in court on page 27, line 9, and I read and what Ayalon says that your car entered his lane, says that he can say for sure that he saw a vehicle that entered Ayalon's lane, as if it came to turn left. He goes on to say that he is sure that the accident happened on his lane, which is the lane of the vehicle involved, and I tell you that the examiner does rely on the testimony of Ayalon Zadok in this matter and not as you think he completely ruled Ayalon Zadok outright?
A. Ayalon said that I entered their lane at 90 degrees and that's what he saw, and he insists on it, and even if he was verified with the forensic evidence of the vehicles, he still insists on what he saw.
When they explained to Ayalon that in light of the findings of the field of vision testThere could be an illusion that I'm entering their lane at 90 degrees, I appear in the protocols.
To Beyham's question"Q, Ayalon Zadok testifies that he drove in a pulled lane, the one involved overtaked, back, was in the lane, you took out into their lane, how you got out is irrelevant because the examiner says it was at the exit of the curve and it's not true, but still Ayalon insists that the accident was in their lane, it doesn't matter how you got out, but he insists that it was in his lane.
The testimony responded: This is not trueAyalon also says that my car made a somersault in the air. Ayalon also says that he saw my car deviate two or three times. As for Ayalon Zadok's testimony, I am only saying that Maayan Sabri is honorable in his place, but he also brought up conclusions from the testimonies that misled Judge Edri who was in the case. Judge Edri writes that he does rely on the testimonies of Ayalon Zadok and Yisrael Zadok." (See his testimony of April 1,2025, pp. 109-111).