He testified, because various car parts were found in the Kia car. According to him, from his professional experience, these are the parts?
that do not belong to the car However, he confirms that he did not inspect the parts.
The witness was confronted with the question, because the key situation in Switzerland has no significance since the only action
that it can have is a mechanical release of the protective wheel if it is locked and it has nothing to do with
Car ComputerHe testified:
"The Court's Note:
The witness asked to review the examiner's report
...
A. Situation - I put the key in the switch, turned it to release the mechanical lock of the steering wheel, the vehicle is already in the ON position, throughout the entire towing or rescue operation the key in the switch should be left in the ON position and since I was asked by the accuser if I was present at the scene of an accident in general I reply that I noticed that I saw that the tow rider while pulling the vehicles to his tow vehicle he continues to shift the steering wheel to the right and left and this means that the key is in the ON position.
Q. Don't you know what happened with the Kia before it arrived on the field?
A. I don't know.
Q. I'm telling you that everything you claimed about data shredding or data number is irrelevant at all because you didn't penetrate the module and you have no idea if there are events saved or how many were saved and then your dump report is irrelevant, what do you say?
A. I refer to my opinion section 18.11 and I read that the module was damaged, whether due to accidental damage or life-saving rescue operations and/or exposure to weather damage, it is not possible to connect to the module that is damaged. This is my final conclusion.
Q. And I come back to the question again that everything you claimed regarding data shredding or data is irrelevant because you don't know what exists and how much data was saved?
A. I have such an option, I connected to a Yodnai and Kia type of vehicles and learned from my professional experience that when a vehicle remains in the ON position, further actions after the accident will cause the data to be disrupted and shredded.
Q. In our case with the module of the Kia car, were you unable to penetrate the device if there are any saved events or several saved events?
A. I have no ability to know that the accuser did not preserve the exhibit properly, did not dismantle it, did not seize it, and also does not have the capabilities, possibilities and means to do so, and it did not take action to download the data
Q. Today you said that you didn't infiltrate the module because you didn't want to damage the device?
A. Because you didn't let me dismantle it.
...
A. The police did not allow me to disassemble the module's unit for the purpose of testing. In other words, they did not allow me to disassemble the module from the vehicle with the screws, nor did they allow me to disassemble the module's unit in terms of opening it from its own screws. What I did was only a voltage test." (See his testimony of May 14,2026, pp. 158-159, paras. 17-33,1-23).