When the examiner was told that as a result of his failure to summon the witness, Section 6 of the indictment was recorded.
The deviations of the defendant's vehicle and he replied:
"I did not write the indictment. The last document in the file in which I express an opinion is the examiner's report. The examiner's report relates to all the findings that I see fit and refers to them, I did not just omit the eyewitness Israel Zadok." (See his testimony of January 15,2025, p. 56, paras. 19-21).
If so, the examiner was asked, where is the exception in the examiner's report that the testimony of the eyewitness Yisrael Zadok does not match the findings, and he replied:
"My conclusion is that the driver of the car swerved out of the lane. If I thought I could rely on the witness, it would also appear in the final conclusion and it was recorded that the driver of car A swerved out of his lane several times. You can see that I did an entire field of vision experiment in which I examine what can be seen and what cannot be seen, and also in the main interrogation I said that I did not rely on Israel Zadok in the final conclusion.
To Beyham's question"Q, does the witness Israel Zadok say that the defendant swerved three times and in your conclusion it says that the defendant swerved, can I understand from this that the defendant strayed and rely on the testimony of Israel Zadok?
The witness replies: If the court only reads the examiner's report, it can understand that the court (90)The examiner - A.H.B.) will also rely on the testimony of Yisrael Zadok regarding the deviation.
To the Court's Question: Is It Written in All the Court Documentsthat you reject the witness Yisrael Zadok's version? Even the slightest indication?
The witness replies: I don't remember." (See his testimony of January 15,2025, pp. 56-57, paras. 7-27-33,1-7).
The examiner confirmed in his testimony in court, because in retrospect he would have written in the examiner's report that he did not rely on the testimony of the witness Israel Zadok regarding the number of deviations. According to the examiner, he recorded the testimony of the witness Israel in the conclusions of the examiner's report, as he brought all the relevant testimonies regarding the weather at the time of the accident.