Dispersion of Fragments
From the examiner's report and the evidence submitted as part of his testimony, you can also learn about the dispersal of the fragments at the scene of the accident.
According to the sketch (P/31), the distribution of the fragments is marked with the letter "F" and is located in three locations, two in the lane of vehicle B and another on the curb adjacent to the lane of vehicle B and in close proximity to the final location of vehicle B on the curb after the accident.
According to Figure P/37, the distribution of the fractures is marked with the letter "F" and according to the diagram it is located in the mixed driving lane twice and on the edge adjacent to the mixed driving lane.
This also emerges from the photos submitted to the court - P/32, photographs Nos. 5 and 15 as well as from a video of the examiner from the scene after the accident - P/34, where the examiner is heard saying: "Scattering of fractures mostly in the lane of vehicle B".
The scattering of the fragments combined with the other findings found at the scene, including the grooves and the testimonies of the prosecution witnesses, they also strengthen Examiner Tsabari's determination regarding the location of the accident and the fault in the accident.
The court did not lose sight of the fact that a prosecution witness 3Guy Cohen, who was the first at the scene after the accident, testified that he moved a "bumper" from his seat at the scene after the accident.
In his cross-examination, the witness was confronted with the fact that he removed fragments from the scene and not just a bumper and testified:
"Q. When you say and I quote "that there were a lot of pieces of plastic in the middle of the road that I turned before the fire and MDA came...", does that mean that Finnish was just a bumper?
A. Maybe in an event like this, I realized that there were trapped people and we had to get to them, so I don't know if I just took out the bumper, but I remember that there were small parts scattered and still remained on the road.
To Beyham's question"Q, I'm explaining to you the defense attorney's question before the court, you testified that you moved one bumper and in your testimony to the police you said you moved a lot of plastic parts, so what's true?
The witness replies: It could be that the word "I moved" was confused with the word "I saw." (See his testimony of January 8,2025, p. 18, paras. 2-21).