Caselaw

Serious Crimes Case (Beer Sheva) 63357-03-18 State of Israel – F.M.D. V. Assaf Masoud Suissa - part 86

February 15, 2021
Print

Testimony of Defendant 2

Defendant 2 testified that Defendant 1 told him that he had a friend who sold drugs, they went to the house of the deceased friend the day before the incident and smoked with him some of the cannabis he selled, while Defendant 1 and the deceased talked about the cost of purchasing 70 grams of cannabis; Defendant 1 was supposed to pay for the drug, and he himself came as a friend of Defendant 1 and because he wanted to smoke and taste the drug, and perhaps buy it later.  At a certain point, the deceased said that he had to go to work and they left, and since defendant 1 did not want to pay the amount that the deceased asked for the drugs, defendant 1 suggested that they break into the deceased's apartment in order to steal the drugs, and he agreed.  After they were unable to break into the deceased's home through the door and through the windows, they left the scene; Defendant 1 spoke with the deceased and the next day told him that the deceased had brought the drugs to his home, and that he was not interested in paying for them, but wanted to threaten the deceased and asked him to come to him (pp. 452-454).

According to him, although he had concerns, he came to the house of defendant 1 in the evening, who told him that the deceased was supposed to arrive after he finished work, and they sat with his neighbor and the girlfriend of defendant 1, smoked from the deceased's drugs and drank alcohol.  After some time, the deceased called defendant 1 and said that he was waiting downstairs, and defendant 1 asked him to go down with him; When the plan was to threaten and intimidate the deceased so that defendant 1 would not pay for the drugs, and defendant 1 wanted to take him to a secluded and quiet place, since he did not want to cause noise to the neighbors and threaten him under his house.  Defendant 2 claimed that he himself only wanted to smoke from the drugs without paying for them, and that his job was only to accompany defendant 1 because of his large and threatening appearance (pp. 455-456, 478, 483).

Previous part1...8586
87...202Next part