The defendants got into the deceased's car, and defendant 1 instructed the deceased to go to the forest. When they arrived, Defendant 1 spoke to the deceased and told him that he would not receive money for the drugs, they began to argue, and then Defendant 1 gave the deceased a number of "kappas" and "I don't remember if I gave him a kaffa or touched him." The deceased turned and fell backwards with his head on a stone, and after a few minutes in which defendant 1 tried to talk to him and wake him up, they saw that the deceased was unresponsive and noticed blood dripping from his head, and because of the rain that fell the blood flow increased greatly. He was in shock, nervous about the situation and could not think properly, defendant 1 told him that the deceased was not responding, and therefore they began to drag the deceased into the car thinking that perhaps the heat in the car would improve his condition (pp. 456-458, 483, 486-487).
After placing the deceased in the car and waiting for a few minutes, the defendants saw that the car was filled with blood, realized that the deceased was not waking up and the pressure on him increased. Defendant 1 wanted to hide evidence and said that they would go buy fuel, and he himself followed him and actually agreed with him and thought that this was the most logical solution, since he thought that they would not believe their version of what happened. They went to a gas station, Defendant 1 went to the salesman and then filled up on gasoline into a jerrycan he found, and he himself waited on the side and at a certain point when Defendant 1 called for help, he went to help him with no choice. When they finished, they returned to the scene in the hope that in the meantime the deceased had woken up, but when they got to the car and saw the condition of the deceased who was "just spilling, falling", they realized that he was probably dead. Defendant 1 tried to set the car on fire but did not succeed, after which defendant 1 found perfume in the car, sprayed on something, lit it and threw it into the car, the car went up in flames and they fled to the home of defendant 1 (pp. 458-460, 485, 487). Defendant 2 denied Defendant 1's statement in the interrogation that he was the one who told him to pour the gasoline on the deceased, and noted that Defendant 1 said that he lied during the interrogation; He also denied that he was the one who sprayed the perfume on the paper before defendant 1 lit it, and claimed that he did nothing in this situation but stood by and watched (pp. 492-493).