Counsel for the accuser petitioned to set an appeal in the main case, a punishment range from 8 to 18 months in prison. In the attached file, she petitioned to file an appeal with respect to the first charge in the attached file, a compound ranging from 6 to 18 months in prison, and in relation to the second charge in the attached file, a compound ranging from 10 to 24 months in prison.
It also requested that the defendant's sentencing claims not be placed at the bottom of the punishment compounds, due to his criminal and traffic record, and that he be sentenced to 32 months in prison in a financial-supreme file alongside an accompanying punishment, in the form of imprisonments, a monetary case – supreme probation, compensation for all the victims of the offense, a suspension of a driver's license in a financial-supreme and supreme financial file, a fine and an undertaking.
The defense's arguments for punishment
Counsel for the defendant argued that the defendant had a non-burdensome criminal record, which included 3 previous convictions, and for his second conviction he was sentenced to 32 months in prison. After his release from prison, he issued an injunction (permanent) injunction to prevent the defendant from pursuing the defendant without tools and without treatment from the Prisoner Rehabilitation Authority and returned to the same world he knew, to make quick money in order to obtain drugs, which undermined a financial case – the Supreme Court and harmed his soul.
He also noted that when the defendant finished consolidating his military service claims and traveled around the world, he arrived at the National Insurance Institute's festival in Australia, where he silenced a family with drugs and ordered an injunction (permanent) to do/an injunction (permanent) to prevent (permanent) after himself at the end of the party naked, after no less than 5 men appealed a financial case - the Supreme Court and presented to the court a consolidation of claims disability assessment and noted that the appeal of a financial case - the Supreme Court and the defendant had 64% mental disability. Counsel for the defendant argued that the defendant had been taking National Insurance for PTSD and had been taking Cipralex for 11 years, and that when he was arrested for receiving the stolen car, the IPS did not provide him with the consolidation of the claims for the medication he required, and therefore for 5 days the defendant cried out for his receipt, and for this reason the threat he made stemmed from the threat. He also claimed that the detention until the end of the proceedings was a known syndrome for the cessation of medication that could have led to the blatant threat. Counsel for the defendant noted that the defendant had been held by the National Insurance Institute for more than 48 hours, and therefore the Claims Union made the second threat detailed in the two arbitration claims, which he claimed was a threat made out of distress. He further noted that the defendant did not threaten a financial case – the prison guard was a direct threat, but rather the threat was heard in the ears of the other prison guards, and that the consolidation of the prison guard's claims is known from the moshav in which they live and due to the existence of friendships between the families. Counsel for the defendant further noted that this behavior of the defendant caused shame to his family.