The witness, Dr. S. Libiki: but it's an example of why we care about community measurements and that stack measurements don't provide the same information on air quality.
Interpreter, Idit: But this is an example of why what is important to us is the measurements in the community and why the measurements near the chimneys do not give us the same information. Stacks don’t give us.. the measurements from the stacks don’t give us..
[....]
Interpreter, Idit: And why measurements that are made in the area of the chimneys or chimneys do not give us information regarding the air quality in the community.
[....]
Interpreter, Idit: When I have crowded community monitoring, dense monitoring, dense monitoring. I have intensive monitoring of the community, in the community
Adv. Mr. Amos Goren: of the exposures.
Interpreter, Idit: of the exposures in the community, OK. When I have intensive monitoring of exposures in the communityThank you.
The witness, Dr. S. Libiki: I would use that over stack information, it's more useful.
Interpreter, Idit: That's what I would use, and not the information from the chimneys, it's more useful.
(In detail, pp. 1704-1709).
- Livki was also asked and answered:
Adv. Mr. A. Amorai: But you will agree with me that when an industry is so close to the residents, as in the case of Haifa, the pollution they spread, whether it is according to the regulations or not, is at the expense of those residents who did not allow the factories to pollute them. This is an infringement on their autonomy to breathe clean air. That's right, ma'am...
The witness, Dr. S. Libiki: This is exactly why you put in air quality onitors, because you want to make sure that the residents air quality is acceptable. That's it.
Tamir Dayan (Z.L.: 'Interpreter'): That's exactly why they're putting Monitors who check the air quality. This is designed to make sure that the air quality is acceptableis plausible.
Adv. Mr. A. Amorai: Meets the standard?