Junger testified that the demand to register a small sum in the contract "bothered me very much," and yet, according to him, "I didn't want to blow up the deal a few minutes before the signing" (paragraph 10 of his affidavit). Similarly, Ms. Shimoni Cohen admitted in her interrogation, "because we were already on the same day. Maybe if I had known that everything had to be brought in cash beforehand, and all sorts of things that I would have known a few years ago, it would have seemed strange to me, but we had already spent the money and we were there. Most of the things were said to us on the same day, on the same day, to me anyway" (p. 1353 of Prov. Sh. 21-26). It follows that even though the plaintiffs were presented with an illegal stipulation that they had difficulty accepting and accepting, in the form of registering in the contracts a sum less than what they had paid, they nevertheless chose to sign the contracts after they had already been equipped with the full consideration and handed it over to Mr. Dahari.
Who are we as one of the plaintiffs, Mr. Sidon, who testified fairly, "I had light bulbs, all the lights in the world were flickering..." (p. 1227, paras. 21-23).
The essence of these bright 'warning lights' will teach us that plaintiffs 3-7 were talked about entering into transactions for the purchase of land parcels, without seeing the seller before and not exchanging any conversation with him, while they were asked in advance to acquire cash in a considerable amount for the purpose of making the payment. This demand seemed puzzling to them, in a way that surprised even the bank's representatives. Despite this. The plaintiffs stocked up with the full amount and transferred it to Mr. Dahari, even though they had not yet seen the wording of the contract they were required to sign, and in any event, they did not take into account the possible difficulties in signing the contract. Afterwards, when they arrived at the office of the transfer of a place of hearing, Mr. Dahari told them that they had to record in the contracts a significantly lower amount than what they had actually paid, while submitting false reports to the tax authorities. The plaintiffs nevertheless chose to sign the contracts and act in accordance with the illegal demand. None of the plaintiffs informed their counsel, and the venue of the hearing was concealed, because they had just been informed that the amount written in the contract was different from the one actually paid. The plaintiffs even claimed that they "did not read the contract exactly" (testimony of plaintiff 3, p. 40 of Prov. Q. 9-10), since "everyone was euphoria" (ibid., paras. 10-11). After the contracts were signed, the plaintiffs handed over to Mr. Elia Shimoni, who served as their representative, all the cash they had brought with them, and Mr. Shimoni approached Mr. Dahari to transfer the sums to the Goren meeting place, which stood on the other side of the street, while the other plaintiffs were not allowed to access it.