Caselaw

Civil Case (Be’er Sheva) 7137-09-18 Netanel Attias v. Alon Goren - part 43

November 16, 2025
Print

All in all, in my opinion, it is reasonable to assume that in the race for the business potential that plaintiffs 3-7 envisioned, they chose to turn a blind eye to all the 'warning lights' that were placed against them, including the fact that in the contracts they signed it was explicitly stated that the seller's rights, after the transfer of the Goren hearing place, were "lease rights from the Israel Lands Administration" (see the first of the contracts), and also from the fact that the transfer of the venue of the hearing informed them about clause 15 of the lease contract.  In their eagerness to sign the contracts, the plaintiffs chose not to give it any consideration, wishing that at the end of the day things would work out, and that if the manager would nevertheless return the plots of land, they would receive "handsome compensation", as evidenced by the reliable testimony of the transfer of the place of the Mu'alem hearing (p.  2522, paras.  13-14).

Mrs. Shimoni Cohen testified in her fairness, "I preferred that this transaction not be made" (ibid., p.  1354, para.  7), but according to her, she nevertheless signed the contract because her partner, Mr. Elia Shimoni, "is not afraid of risks, I am more considerate, I am more prudent and I preferred not to make the transaction" (ibid., paras.  15-17).  Mrs. Shimoni Cohen further added that the combination of these words led to the conclusion that "the things here are strange" (ibid., at p.  1346, paras.  15-16), and that "everything here seems strange to me" (ibid., p.  1348, s.  1).  Mr. Sidon also admitted that the constellation of signing the transactions is a "delusional, delusional" thing (p.  1286, para.  26), and that "I think it is completely psychotic.  Really, I don't have...  In retrospect, I exploded.  I'm telling the truth, really psychotic..." (ibid., p.  1287, s.  7-9) to the extent that we were "really stupid" (p.  1289, s.  18; Ibid., p.  1227 (10-23).  The plaintiffs consciously chose to remove the doubts that arose, lest they interfere with the realization of their hopes in which they had pinned their hopes.

Previous part1...4243
44...136Next part