Moving the venue of the hearing Junger further claimed, like his friend Cohen's relocation of the venue, that "I did not know that there was another agreement between Alon Goren and the manager" (paragraph 13 of his affidavit). However, this argument is inconsistent with his other claim that "I read the contract while staying in Adv. Mualem's office, and the contract seemed reasonable to me" (ibid.). In the contract signed by the transfer of the venue, Junger explicitly states that "the seller is the owner of the lease rights from the Israel Lands Administration" (the preamble to the contract), and that "the buyer declares... Because he knows that the property is agricultural land..." (Clause 5 of the contract). In view of this, for the same reasons that I detailed regarding the transfer of the Cohen hearing place, I found that even the claim of the relocation of the venue of the hearing was rejected by Junger that he did not know that there was a contract between defendant 4 and the manager.
Moreover. Moving the venue of the hearing, Junger claimed, "I did not know who Alon Goren was until then and I had never heard his name" (paragraph 6 of his affidavit). In other words. After the transfer of the venue of the hearing, Junger was about to enter into the transaction when he did not know the identity of the seller from whom he was to purchase the land, and he and his friends were even forbidden to meet with the unknown owner, as Mr. Horowitz claimed. This was enough to cause a potential buyer, and certainly a lawyer entrusted with the provisions of the law, to seriously consider withdrawing from this transaction. However, not only did Junger not consider moving the venue, but when Mr. Dahari informed him, according to him, that he had to pay the entire sum in cash, and when he moved the venue, Junger thought that this demand "seemed strange to me" (ibid., paragraph 10), he did not refrain from signing the contract. And now, on the day of signing the contract, Junger argued that Mr. Dahari added that the seller requested that the amount to be recorded in the contract be less than the amount actually paid. Junger said that this demand "bothered me a lot (in the understatement)," and that "I was a little shocked... and I am not accustomed to such methods of work" (ibid., section 10). However, despite all that was revealed to him - both with regard to the prohibition to ascertain the identity of the seller long before the contract was signed, with regard to the necessity of bringing the full amount in cash, and with regard to false registration in the contract at the time of its signing - the transfer of the venue of the hearing was made, Junger admitted, "... I didn't want to blow up the deal a few minutes before the signing ceremony."